/ Travel & Leisure

Rail: are they wheelie on track to deliver better service?

Train tracks

It was bittersweet news for rail passengers last week – Southern passengers learned they’ll get compensated for the poor services they’ve endured of late, they, along all other rail users, discovered fares will rise by an average of 2.3% from 2 January. But, do you think your train service is improving?

If you’re one of Southern’s passengers then, the chances are that, this compensation offering is small fry for what you’ve endured recently.

And whether you’re a passenger of Southern or not, you may well be troubled by the news of fare hikes, which just so happens to be the largest average rise in three years.

Surely such an increase would be all the more palatable if you could be guaranteed improvements to your service?

Rail passenger rights

As some of you may recall, last year, we made our super-complaint to the Office of Rail and Road (ORR), after our research into access to compensation for rail delays and cancellations found that millions was going unclaimed every year, with only around 34% of affected passengers actually claiming.

It was clear to us that not enough was being done to inform passengers of their rights to compensation. And so we launched our Make Rail Refunds Easier campaign and made a super-complaint to the ORR.

In November, the government responded to our super-complaint on compensation for rail delays. It confirmed that it supports all improvements recommended by the ORR.

Over the past year, alongside our almost 50,000 supporters, we’ve been campaigning to get train companies to make their passengers more aware of their rights to claim compensation for train delays and take steps to make the process of claiming easier.

Getting a better service

And indeed it seems that rail passengers should be expecting improvements. The government has agreed that much more is needed from train companies and it has set out its own plan to ensure the regulator and industry push through these improvements promised in response to our super-complaint.

In fact, today, the government announced plans to reform the way rail infrastructure is managed with a review of how Network Rail shares the running of the tracks with train companies. According to the government, its plan to coordinate track control between Network Rail and train companies will improve the daily running of railways and therefore improve services for passengers.

Some of you will also recall that back in October, after waiting and waiting, we finally saw an extension of compensation rights for rail passengers to be included under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.

And at the same time it was announced that rail passengers will be able to claim ‘Delay Repay’ compensation when trains are delayed by 15-29 minutes. Previous rules had only enabled passengers to claim for delays of at least 30 minutes.

This new compensation threshold will be introduced in a staggered roll-out, starting with Southern passengers, who will be able to claim for these delays from 11 December. Dates for other train companies are yet to be confirmed.

On the right track?

So, while it would seem that we could well be on the right track to seeing real improvements for passengers, much more is needed to get rail passengers a fairer deal and a better service. With improvements promised but still yet to be delivered, our work here is far from over.

Announcements on next steps for Which?’s rail campaign will be coming soon. But in the meantime, tell us: do you think train services are improving? What else would you like to see to to improve your train service?

Comments
Guest
Neil Barton says:
7 December 2016

Endemic practices since the very beginning of railways have been the norm ! What one does to streamline,eradicate the way they perform,produce a comprehensive service and system is some thing for the gods to tangle with. Both,or possibly three sides of the argument could qualify for a NOBEL peace prize for infrastructure-if they were halfway serious in providing a rail system that worked for everybody and,I include the long suffering commuting passengers.
All my life there hasn’t been a year that I can recall which there hasn’t been a dispute of any description between those involved in running “The Railways” and either HM government and militant unions at each others throats. We,as a nation should hold our heads in shame,it’s totally and absolutely pathetic.

Guest

So called militant unions- such a cop out. In Germany , which has the strongest unions in Europe, the unions share in the decision making. The Sunderland car plant is how it could be here. It’s always been US and THEM in industrial relations in this country. Typical Thatcherite response.

Guest
Dave Allison says:
7 December 2016

The overcrowding and poor timekeeping on our services have nothing to do with trade unions. It’s mainly due to private companies being awarded franchises which they are incapable of fulfilling. They have neither the rolling stock or train staff to meet the demands of modern public transport.

Our local service (London – Midland) consistently runs vastly overcrowded trains. It was warned by the government for failing to provide a reliable service after many complaints but it was still given the franchise.
Even though the platform at our local station has been extended many trains still have insufficient coaches even though London – Midland can’t now use it as an excuse.
Their reply when I complained of carriages packed tighter than would be allowed for the transport of cattle was laughable. They blamed the guard for allowing the overcrowding even though families with small children and pushchairs were left on the platform, bearing in mind that at the time it was an hourly service and there were no toilet facilities on the station. They also said that there was no danger to standing passengers, many of whom had no handhold, because their trains had special (undefined) safety features to prevent injury. Remarkable considering the age of some of the rolling stock and very much the opposite of what happened on a German train which was involved in an accident where many of the worst injuries were inflicted on standing passengers who were thrown the length of the carriages.

Very much a case of shareholders before service.

Guest
Margaret littlejohn says:
7 December 2016

I am most worried of all about women’s safety on trains when they dispense with guards i order to stick more money in the chief execs’ pockets. That dreadful Thatcher anti-woman has already made many stations unsafe at night by unmanning stations. I for one simply will not use unguarded trains in quiet areas or late at night. How dare they do this to me!

Guest

Why the complaint. Every year it is the same: HIGHER fares, lower service. Only one solution: deliver the service receive the reward. Would you entertain paying for your groceries first then collecting them. Well for online shoppers that is exactly the procedure.

Guest
John Bourne says:
7 December 2016

Forget HS2 , & use the money to sort out / update the existing system .

Guest
Wyn Stokes says:
7 December 2016

It’s an absolute disgrace in this day and age what is happening . Of course it will not affect the people that want to do this it affects the working class all the time. I absolutely agree with Margaret Little John about it not being safe if there are no conducted on the trains AND Don t they think that the driver has enough to do for passenger safety driving the train. I would like to see some of these brain boxes doing their job. We Don t need the hs2 as John Bourne stated they need to make our railways that we already have better.

Guest
mick says:
7 December 2016

Biggest con trick of modern times forced on the British people by Rail Privatisation by a Tory Government I am a retired Railway Engineer with 30 years service post and pre privatisation.
We have to understand that if 1/3 of the total cost spent on privatising the railways had been allocated to improving the system under public ownership, we would have had the best run railway system in the world.
Today it is a total disaster, as is the case with other privatised public services, when Britain’s Privatised Railways make profits for Foreign State Owned Train Companies.
Cheaper Rail Travel in these countries, rising Rail fares in this country.