Does a rail voucher cut it when your train has been delayed?

ScotRail refused to accept my disabled daughter’s concession card and made her pay full price for part of her journey that should have been a £1 flat fare. They had her in tears telling her the card was only for blind people. I spoke to their Customer Relations who agreed she had been wrongly and badly treated but when I sent off the tickets and proof of concession as requested they never got back to me.

A friend asked me to use her rail voucher (received for delays) because she rarely travelled by rail. Trouble is that most of my journeys are short ones as well. The first time I could have used it, the best deal was for Advance tickets and the ticket office said it was too complex for them to sell and directed me to buy them on-line, which I did, but could not use the voucher.
It was three months before the voucher expired when I went on another long journey, this time where it suited me to buy the simpler off-peak return at the local ticket office and could use the voucher and finally refund my friend.

Given the continuing trend to encourage passengers to buy tickets on-line or from machines the issue of compensation vouchers that must be redeemed at a manned ticket office reflects an antiquated approach to customer relations.

It’s not only the inflexibility of compensation by voucher that’s a problem, but the confusion of different levels of compensation threshold. WeekIy for over 5 years, I travel a journey on one Advance ticket that covers First Great Western, South West Trains and East Coast, with the East Coast part of the journey having to be on a specific train. It is by no means clear which company’s rules (yes, they’re all different) apply to a delay – the companies’ “customer service” phone lines don’t even agree. In addition, there can be issues arguing with guards on the East Coast journey when the delay was on the FGW line – which not infrequently chooses to turn trains round early when they’re late, not even turning up at my station. Plus, SWT seems to delight in rejecting valid claims for compensation – on several occasions it’s taken quite an exchange of correspondence before they actually bother to read my reasons for the claim and don’t simply reject it for spurious reasons. And yes, when they do compensate me, it’s by a voucher I can’t use at my local unmanned station or online, and as that’s quite an expensive journey the vouchers exceed the cost of buying local tickets which are the only ones I don’t buy online.

I don’t really object to receiving rail vouchers in principal. After all, if you complain to Sainsburys, what do you get? A credit note for Sainsburys.
What I do object to is the fact that It is almost impossible to use the vouchers. The rail companies very much want us to book online so any credit which they give should be either credited directly back to the card used to purchase or, failing that, should be useable, maybe as a code, when purchasing online and at the ticket machines.
I have several vouchers, some of which I have now had over 10 months but our nearest manned ticket office is a 35 mile round journey. It ends up being cheaper to throw them in the bin than to use them.

Rail vouchers are provided because the service which was paid for was woefully inadequate (you don’t get anything in most cases for less than an hour’s delay, regardless of the initial duration of the journey). What’s wrong with getting a refund in the same form in which you paid? In most cases that’ll be a refund directly to the card you paid with.

The whole drive of the rail industry for at least five years has been a) to make purchasing anything other than advance tickets punitively expensive, and b) to book tickets online. Providing a system where a voucher which runs out after a year (and you lose the difference between the voucher value and any cheaper ticket you want to buy) is not the same as a proper refund. Making it more difficult to actually buy tickets as well by not allowing online purchases is grossly unfair. Why not put codes on the tickets which can be used online? Most other industries do this – it’s not a difficult concept..

It feels like another way of ticking the box of ‘yes, we do customer service’ while making it as difficult as practically possible for customers to actually get their refunds. Maybe if we went back to being ‘passengers’ instead of ‘customers’ we could get back to a focus on actually getting us to our destinations as planned..

Like everyone else commenting here I have a collection of vouchers but find it very difficult to use them. My local train station has a ticket office but it is frequently closed due to lack of staff, at least that is what the hand written sign says. No change given when a voucher is used, not even as a lesser value voucher. Is this another way of fining the passenger. Vouchers must be able to be used for online purchases. The train companies will not do this voluntarily so the regulator should make them.

Hi,
I have a £12 voucher which is about to expire. I went on line (national rail) to see what was available. I chose a first class return for £44 (singles can be over £120 second class!). I decided to print it out, take it to my local station and use my voucher.
They could not get anywhere near the same price or route!
Option: send the vouchers to Virgin. Same route, same Virgin train, same everything, but £13 more expensive. So using the voucher will prove more expensive than binning it -> what wonderful compensation!

I think the issue is that this is not about refunding your original expense but compensating you for inconvenience. Theoretically that would mean that you could claim compensation for being delayed and also (if the sale of goods act applies to train tickets) demand a full refund if the delay meant that your journey was not fit for purpose (ie if you missed the meeting that was the purpose of the journey).
Would the train operator have to pay up twice?
I wonder if anyone has tried it?