/ Technology

Are we really ditching our TVs?

Cartoon man praying over broken TV

In the technology world, and indeed the world itself, there are a few immutable truisms. One of these is that pretty much everyone has a TV. However, research in America suggests that TV ownership is dropping.

Telly market saturation hit 100% decades ago. Today, you’d probably be hard pushed to find a household with fewer than three TVs.

But hold on a cotton-picking moment – what’s this news that reaches me from across the pond?

New research from Nielsen estimates that the total number of US households with a TV will drop from 99% to 97% in the next year, marking the first such decline for 20 years.

The recession or the internet

Apparently the blame can be squarely laid on the recession. While the price of flatscreen TVs is falling, it’s the cost of pay-TV subscriptions that are switching US consumers off. Not only is the cost of cable increasing, but low-income Americans – according to the New York Times – just ‘cannot afford new digital sets and antennas’.

So are these people simply giving up on television, throwing their analogue tellies in a skip and finding more rewarding forms of entertainment? The photos of old, discarded cathode ray sets being recycled that accompany the NYT’s article might suggest so.

However, muddying the waters slightly is a debate over whether US folk are giving up their cable TV subscriptions in favour of watching telly online. They may not own TVs, but they are still consuming programmes via broadband.

TV ownership in the UK

So will this trend transfer to the UK? Well this is only anecdotal evidence, but there’s a particularly high concentration of Sky dishes attached to council estate blocks in my corner of South London, just as there’s always been.

This suggests that even when faced with a deep recession, and the choice offered by the BBC and its arguably good-value license fee, things have to get pretty bad financially for people to start abandoning their satellite subscriptions, let alone give up on television entirely.

As for me, I very nearly grew up without a TV. My father, in the 70s, thought he’d surprise his new wife with a television to fill that vacant corner of the living room. Unfortunately, when the delivery man arrived, brandishing a box, my mother sent him packing, as there seemed no place or need in her life for such a device.

It was only after he’d double-checked the address, and drawn a blank with the neighbours that she reluctantly conceded that maybe the TV was for our household after all. Thirty years later, I think she still occasionally gazes at the box, when there’s ‘something on worth watching’.

How about you? What would make you relinquish the life-enriching power of your TV?

Comments
Profile photo of dean
Member

One can certainly live without a TV feed, but to live without a screen entirely? impossible.

I lived in Holland for 1 month without a TV and in Germany for about a year. It didn’t mean I watched any less telly, I just ended up downloading the shows I wanted to watch and just streamed them from my computer to tv.

No adverts, exactly what you want to watch, it was great!

F1 and champions league I had to go to the pub though, for shame! 🙂

Profile photo of Nikki Whiteman
Member

I agree with Dean – living without a screen would be hard, but without a TV specifically? No problem. I hadn’t had a TV since I was at Uni, but then a year ago my housemate moved in and brought one with her. I lived in a state of panicked confusion until I’d hooked it up to a computer. Watching things live still makes me feel funny – how do people put up with it? There are loads of adverts, and if you want to nip to the toilet you might miss crucial bits. It seems really old-fashioned.

I am still astounded when people spend a tonne of money on huge flatscreen TVs so they can watch things as broadcast. With iPlayer, 4od, Youtube shows, and lots of live streaming content, there is more available on the internet than you could ever watch in a lifetime.

People will never give up *watching* things – they’ll still pay their license fees and their subscriptions, they’ll just watch on something that we wouldn’t recognise as a ‘TV’ any more.

Profile photo of john kirby
Member

I have a very nice Samsung 3D TV, and must admit if it had not been for the 3D aspect, I doubt we would have replaced our exisiting screen, but as above, my four children have TV but use them as screens for Wii, X-Box, Playstations, and as larger monitors for their laptops, it is the multimedia aspects that people buy for and freeview and freesat just gives a bit more choice.

Member
Sophie Gilbert says:
6 May 2011

My laptop is too small and too old and my broadband connection too ineffective at times for me to seriously consider ditching my TV. I watch live TV or on demand TV or I record programmes to watch later as appropriate. I have freeview TV through my Virgin cable set top box and I’m more than happy to pay my TV licence given the quality of the programmes we get in this country that wouldn’t be funded otherwise.

Profile photo of Patrick Steen
Member

I couldn’t ditch my TV, even though I hardly ever watch TV programmes on it (I’ll be on iPlayer on my laptop thank you very much). What would I watch movies or play video games on? The screen will have to stay… but I can definitely live without watching terrestrial telly on a set.

Member
Jo Murray says:
6 May 2011

My life is too busy to watch TV. As a result I never know what is on when and I miss all the good programmes. I prefer to live my life, read my books/newspapers when I am ready for them. A continual flow of information (interspersed by rubbish) is out of touch with my own life. How much do people want to be Passive? It is not all bread and circuses/ viewers ratings out here where I live.

Profile photo of richard
Member

The trouble with this topic is the definition of TV – if it is a self contained device only suitable to receive broadcast TV programmes – Then I’m sure the number is dropping slowly

But as most screens can display broadcast programmes then viewing of broadcast programmes hasn’t dropped. My PC screen is significantly larger than my TV – so I use the PC to view most broadcast programmes and DVD videos..

Profile photo of wavechange
Member

Unless I’m ill I rarely switch on the one TV in my house. Radio has more appeal and if if I want to watch TV then iPlayer is a lets me watch what I want when it is convenient. The idea of having to watch a programme when it is broadcast or to record it to view later seems very old fashioned.

Profile photo of arther2
Member

one other small difference also..
Cable TV took off in the US because of poor local reception/bad free market coverage (lack of) planning. So the impact for those giving US cable up, will be much bigger.. all or (almost) nothing,
Cancelled Sky subscriptions fallback to a very wide range of free TV (Freeview plus more) for no cost .. there is relatively little in the way of cable only TV coverage areas in the UK… and certainly not no-Sky coverage areas… so the impact is less.

That said, the choice of reading/gaming/social media material on the internet, now can readily be seen to replace the talk next day about what was on the 4/5 channels last night. Especially as teh viewing is now so fragmented with choice for most.

Giving it up:
As it loses its common/everyone talks about the same programme social cohesion, it’s importance deminshes. As others have shown, a few years at college or as an expat etc, and the dependence quickly goes.. and easily is not replaced .. there is the internet and its provision of stimulation !

As a side topic,
given that the TV set is very much
– not the only place to watch TV
– not only use for this display device… (DVD, blu Ray, games , PC’s, internet directly…)
Isn’t it about time that we ditched this recording/reporting to the TV Licencing Company (!) of every sale of a TV set, or do we instead record every PC sale now.. and hound these people also ?

Surely for the small (and potetially increasing) number of people without aTV, who get regular harressment letters and later visits, we invest that wasted resource cost on paying for TV licences for these people. i.e. assume every one needs one, and just add it to the yearly bill.. the cost will then be less, and there will be no arguments and less stress.

Oh,Me ?
well I have not watched live TV since my area went digital !
..my modern estate is officially an aerial free site…
The cabled system was badly installed, has only 1 feed (no Sky+ then ! – don’t talk TIVO lifetime…) so analogue struggled, SKY worked sometimes…in some weathers..
And I cannot be bothered to follow the neighbours in installing a personal Sky dish…

life is fine without it… and bit of ctachup if needed.
lots of forums and info/news on the internet to read.
especially if the new fibre comes to the street…

Member
Damn Young says:
30 July 2011

No, taxing everyone is not right. It is better to free the BBC from taxpayer dependency, and allow them to flourish in the free market, just like Sky and Virgin. Of course BBC executives would have to buy all of the assets from taxpayers first.

Member
Adrian Wood says:
10 May 2011

I watch very little TV – have more worthwhile ways to use my time – however, when I do watch I appreciate the visually superior and immersive experience of a large screen TV. I can display online programming on such a TV but even with so called HD online material, I find the lack of quality and detail within the image and sound to be so irritating, I really don’t enjoy the experience. As to watching on a PC or laptop – that’s fine when I need to catch up with something – but I don’t find it relaxing – and its lonely, nothing beats cuddling my wife whilst watching large screen TV or movies together.

Profile photo of mikehuk
Member

As a pensioner who watches a lot of television my gripe is about the increasing number and length of adverts, particularly on channels like ITV3. As a result of this I went out and bought a PVR and record programs and am able to skip adverts entirely. However while this solves my problem, I wonder about what will happen when a large proportion of viewers have PVRs and TV advertising loses its affect on actual sales. What will the commercial TV companies do when the advertisers leave? they are killing off the golden goose. I have never bothered with cable or satelite and use Freeview only. I watch lees TV these days as the decline in quality of programs continues, the BBC seem to concentrate more and more on game shows, cookery programs and soaps. As for daytime TV – forget it! – I use Internet radio and love the 50 odd high quality classical music stations.

Profile photo of milbern
Member

Just two days ago I read that all the major ISPs in the US are changing their charging. Those that offered unlimited downloads are withdrawing them and many people who had switched to systems such as Apple TV, thinking that they could save by downloading only what they wanted to watch now find that just a few hours a month (as few as five or six in some cases) would now cost more than their previously unlimited cable subscriptions. We have seen mobile phone companies here switch from unlimited or generous downloads to limited data plans. Landline and mobile charges are rising. There have been minor reductions in broadband charges but the ISPs are probably waiting until a lot of people download what television they want to watch before hoisting their prices. I’ll stick with Freeview or Freesat which we pay for through our licence fee but which I think represents good value compared with most other options.

Member
Mew says:
10 May 2011

I have noticed since I bought a Freeview+ hard drive recorder I watch less TV on-Air and watch more recorded stuff besides watching the News I would go Live with that living in Northern Ireland I consider it important, I can not see doing away with the TV unless the TV Licence goes up too far then the TV would be gone. We need to scrap the TV licence if TV is going to work in the UK.

Member
Garry Dixon says:
10 May 2011

What would make me relinquish the life-enriching power of my TV? Hang on, isn’t this a loaded question? Surely, getting out there and experiencing real life is far more enriching than sitting in front of a box watching it second-hand?

Member
Damn Young says:
30 July 2011

I experimented with TV cold turkey for 6 months, and that was a bit harsh. Now I only watch DVDs, one film per evening, with no adverts. That is very acceptable, and is actually less hours than previously. I find that it is actually better TV too. I listen to the radio more now.
Council estates bristle with dishes because the inhabitants are given far too much in benefits.

Member
Mark says:
4 November 2011

There are still some gems on TV. Having a PVR has changed my life in that I now choose what to watch. However, I’m suspicious of anyone who is proud of not having a TV. It’s like being proud of not owning a book. You have to be selective (in any medium).

Profile photo of jontycampbell
Member

Freecycled my massive (at the time) 29″ Sony Trinitron Tube TV. I don’t miss it – I get far more done.