Taking nuisance calls campaign to Scottish Parliament

Sure its not the weather Roger ? Just look at the complaints here on Which and where they come from .

wavechange you have great faith that Scotland can bring about a miracle I dont have that faith as I am being practicable . You can advise people not to do this or that but that wont stop unwanted calls, the companies keep changing the goal posts . I repeat only legislation can bring change (or a revolution ) . You must have read the bible when Jesus talks to the blind man who has gone to a lot of trouble to meet Jesus and when Jesus asks him if he believes he says yes and he is cured ,and Jesus says- never have I found so much faith ,no not in all the land. I admire that faith.

I don’t know about faith but we – and many others – see the need for legislation. Unfortunately, the government of this country seems to be paying more attention to industry than its citizens. Which? has put a great deal of effort into its campaign to stop nuisance calls but until we have legislation to make them illegal without our consent the problem will drag on.

Wavechange, how do you stop companies lying and saying you opted in? How do you stop them pretending they are genuine marketing or charity calls? How do you stop spoofed numbers? How do you protect vulnerable people?

When you get one of these calls, you only have the word of the complete stranger at the other end of the phone. You have no idea if they are telling you truth or lies.

I get called from mobile phone companies trying to get me to take out a new contract. They know I am with o2, say they are from o2, but they are lying and if I believed them, could find myself in a contract with a company I had no intention of joining. I believed the first person who called me and as it sounded a very good deal and said I would check out the phone they were offering me and the person on the other end said they would call back the next day. If I had decided to take up the offer I would have gone into an o2 store NOT do it over the phone. I checked the phone number I was called from and it was from another company. I did question the person the following day and they admitted they were not from o2 but calling on behalf of o2, still a lie.

I gave an example in the previous convo of a lady saying she was doing market research to improve services in my area. She was lying as the questions had nothing to do with services in my area.

As long as cold calling is permitted, scammers will manipulate the system to continue with nuisance calling. The only reason they call you is to get money out of you one way or another and these convos give too many examples of people who have been conned. You should never enter into a contract with a complete stranger on the other end of a phone no matter how convincing they sound. And they are getting more convincing as they “follow” the rules.

It’s vulnerable people that concern me most, Alfa. I am cautious and have never bought any product or service as a result of a phone call. Even when I receive a call from a company I use, I tell them I will call back after looking up the number.

If we have to opt-in to receiving marketing calls rather than opt-out via TPS, I doubt that many would do this. If most of the calls were illegal then the government could be forced to act. All calls are logged, so if BT was required to confirm that an illegal call was made to a domestic number, action could be taken against the relevant companies. I understand that BT knows the number of the caller even if our caller display shows that it has been withheld or gives a false number.

I want to see market research by phone banned. Even though it is currently legal, the calls are still nuisance calls, and as you have pointed out, marketing calls are often introduced as market research. I have no problem with participating in telephone market research as long as I can make the the call at a time convenient to me.

It would be helpful if Which? had a campaign advising us not to buy goods or services via the phone unless we have made the call.

Wavechange, can you give some examples of companies you would like to opt in to receive calls from?

Examples would be companies that provide me with goods and services (so that I have the opportunity to provide constructive criticism and suggestions) and companies that sell products or services relevant to my hobby interests.

Wavechange, your examples can easily be achieved with emails, texts or even snail mail that are not intrusive.

Can you say all you would like to say about goods and services when you are put on the spot with an unexpected phone call? What is wrong with a free reply to a text or email if you would like a follow-up call for a service? At least you would be expecting it.

I email, write or phone companies when I have something to say to them. I will even sometimes give them my phone number to call me back but I don’t want them calling me unless there is a very good reason like a problem with an order or delivery or appointment.

I am on a lot of emailing lists. Many I have not signed up for but I don’t have a problem with them as they get directed to my junk folder and I can handle them at a time convenient to me and most of them probably get mass deleted anyway.

There is a big difference between a hobby shop phoning you and saying are you still interested in something and the big business of buying and selling of personal data that leads to all the nuisance calls we get where opting in or out just won’t work.

Alfa – I am specifically referring to calls that I have initiated.

I am opposed to companies contacting me by phone unless there is an urgent need to do so. It would make sense for a bank or credit card company to phone me if they suspected illegal activity on my account and needed to let me know as soon as possible. That has not happened but if it did, I would thank the caller and call the company after looking up the number.

As you say, we can make input via email. I am not presently on few mailing lists because I’m concerned that my contact details could be passed on to other ‘carefully selected’ companies.

I always make sure other ‘carefully selected’ companies is not activated.

I do think those carefully selected companies should be named though so you can choose which ones you would like to hear from. i.e. John Lewis would name Waitrose, their Insurance, etc.

This has worked well for me. I also make a point that I do not want to receive marketing calls from the company itself. Vodafone used to pester me and I said that I would leave them if I received one more call, which did the trick. It is worth reminding companies of your marketing preferences when renewing insurances and contracts because these may return to the default settings.

I’m going to wade in here……………Having ran a business I can understand B to B calls but I can safely say that in 20 odd years I have not had a call that interested me…………..If I want glazing,,I’ll phone a couple of local businesses that make pvc windows….If I want a new phone contract which has only been twice in many years I’ll go find one
I’m kinda of the opinion that if I had talked to even 20% of the callers it would have cost me money and also time…………..I have plenty of time but I’d rather be at something constructive even if it takes all day………..I dont have plenty of money so why spend or rubbish I wasnt looking for

No ban all cold calls………..Do we stand and chat to cold callers at our door,,,,,,,no we dont,,,,,,,,,,we try and get rid of them as well mannered as we can and a quickly as we can to the extent that door to door calls are near to zero round here now

I want our phones to go back to our phone not something that everyone from Belfast to Sydney has access to night and day………………Our phone is for our use………….Its we that pay for our phone…………..we should get to choose……………who??????

Doorstep cold calling is now illegal except for charities and religious groups I believe.

Doesn’t stop people leaving bags on your doorstep for unwanted goods calling themselves charities though but at least you can ignore them and you get a free bag !!!

But I completely agree with you that our phones should be for our use and if we want a service, we should be the ones to instigate it.

Precisely. I am not going to buy anything from anyone who phones me or calls at the door. There are not many doorstep salesmen these days but I politely get rid of them.

Here’s one for Duncan
Check out sale of Nuclear Bunker in Ballymena only finished in 1990………….Only for the BBC we would not have known it existed……………How do you build this without the nosey folk knowing what it is…………..how much did that cost to keep this quiet……………………..asking price £575,000……………someone or should we say we paid a h***l of lot more to put 300 odd people whom many of couldn’t grow a potato while those that could will be cooked along with much of the land around them…………
Hypocrites……………………

Dee I see you got a thumbs down I will try and remove it . It obvious somebody doesnt want us talking about things that are sensitive to the government in case the general public get too much information and find out all the lies they have been told . You do know about the government one deep down in ********* and the others ? its a wonder the ground doesnt subside in some cases but there again £100,s of millions are put into them . There,s an old one in Edinburgh but nobody bought it,it was in the news recently . OH no ! a thumbs down -how awful.

To Keith Whyte:-
To reiterate my previous post, nasty intrusive call deserve a nasty reply.
However, if your at a loose end, have some fun. Keep them going foras long as possible, telling them all sorts of rubbish in answer to their questions then end by letting them know it’s all tripe. My personal record is 20 minutes to a former colonial trying to arrange a mobile phone contract . Apart from having great difficulty understanding his accent, it helped to spin it out. His last question was ” How much do you spend a month on calls/texts”. “About £2-£4” was my reply.
He cut off.
Anyway, it was a rainy day!!

And what has Westminster done for all the people on Which and the other websites that have even more people complaining about this issue ?

You are right in near everything……………TPS,,,,,,,,,,,,,,better known to some as a “throttle position sensor”……..Maybe that is a better term for the phone call throttle also!!!!!!!!!!!

Charities,,,John????,,,,,,,,,,,,,,streets full of them everywhere
Here three I know of are operated by former car salesmen and they have volunteers at no wages and shops with no rates yet they themselves all drive high end German cars…………..perfectly legal and above board apparently

It is just not the phone industry that has changed to take advantage of everyone it seems
Gone are the days when someone charitable collected a load of stuff and headed off east to an orphanage or similar…………..and in at least one case a world renowned world champion

DeeKay – I wasn’t intending to open up a debate about charities, and I specifically used the phrase “voluntary organisations” because there are thousands of perfectly respectable, sincere and dedicated organisations across the land that don’t run shops or beg for money but nonetheless do exceedingly good work to help vulnerable people.

Sorry,,,,,,,,,,,,,I’ll not touch on that one again

For years I have hoped that Which? would push for a review of the effectiveness of Ofcom (and Ofgem).

It concerns me that many of us have been subjected to nuisance calls for years, yet most companies have done this without penalty, even when numbers are registered with the TPS. I believe that BT should be providing technical support that will help identify the culprits rather than profiting from the sale of call blocking devices to the victims. 🙁

Looking at the terms and conditions for private telephone services, BT etc can withdraw their service if we misuse our phone. I have repeatedly suggested that an effective penalty for making nuisance calls could be to deprive a company of its phone service for a suitable period. Perhaps this could be done without new legislation.

wavechange ,under the Telecommunications Act legislation would need to take place in order to force companies to comply . Just look at my (and 20,000 others and more ) who took part in crowd funding an organisation so that we could find out if we were on the GCHQ spying list (UK citizens ) cameron and his gang – inside months of this being presented to them by lawyers for the organisation went to Parliament and in a VERY short time CHANGED the LAW so that an organization could NOT speak on our behalf and demand an answer . What did they do ? made it Law that only individual UK citizens could apply and then made it very hard (impossible ) to get an answer . So IF they want to they can do IT ,but they dont want to upset BB

I apologise if you have told me this before, Duncan. As you say, the government is unwilling to offend business, so I am not optimistic that we will get rid of nuisance calls if legislation is the only effective solution.

As we now have two co-opted members who worked for Ofcom as Trustees I suggest you write and ask the question about effectiveness!

My gut feeling is that I am not keen on Council becoming an alternative home for Quango members. Did you vote wavechange?

I think I will stick to orthodox channels. Anyway, I don’t think you were a candidate this time. 🙂

Your right John it can be done and I see your point about making millions from selling to third parties and call-blockers and that the rental would go up if they lost revenue . And your right , as you quote telephone companies NOT only BT as those companies enter BT exchanges -fit their OWN equipment and then have FULL remote control of their customers telephone/broadband services . Telephone companies hide what they are capable of doing its a lot more than the public know. IE- it would be an awful stupid criminal who used the telephone to organise a crime .

Good for you, but people shouldn’t have to pay extra to stop harassment by telepests.
Virtually all nuisance calls are made over BT networks, and instead of working with Ofcom & ICO to stop the problem at source, BT seems to be more interested in making money by selling call-blocking handsets to its long-suffering customers.

Colin a “network ” is a joining together of people/ resources in this case using a pair of wires / fibre to connect the exchange equipment to the outside of the exchange ,nothing more it is therefore ,in the real sense ,a passive method of transmission of voice/ broadband from exchange to customer -ie- radio transmission is an active means of transmission-2 wires/fibre is not . Many companies pay a certain amount to BT for use of those lines ,EXCEPT companies like Virgin who use there own cable ,some smaller ones and Bristol . ALL of those private companies install their OWN equipment in BT exchanges so that ACTIVE transmission of audio/analogue/ digital signals go through their OWN private equipment NOT BT ,s equipment ie- any programming changes are done on the digital (active ) equipment so you have to qualify your post to include all the other private companies . BT will not put itself at a disadvantage to other private companies as it is a business answerable to shareholders .What you should be campaigning for is legislation by HMG to change the Telecommunications Act as they are the ONLY ones -cameron +co. with the power to do that.

Hi Esther, we’re not aware of any problems but I’ll take a look into this for you. Thanks for letting us know