/ Technology

Is this the end of physical formats?

DVD burning in flames

Since humankind first scribbled on cave walls there’s been countless ways to document information. But with the advent of MP3s, GPS and ‘the cloud’ could we be saying our last farewell to physical formats?

The latest digital format to grab the world is the Blu-ray, and it marks a huge leap forward. A twin layer Blu-ray disc can hold around 50 gigabytes (GB) of data, which is more than enough room for a high-definition film, or even a 3D one.

But will it be enough for the 3D films of the future that don’t require 3D specs? The format saw off its HD DVD competitor back in 2008, but is another challenger lurking in the shadows? Perhaps Blu-ray will be the world’s last physical disc, as we begin to download films and games straight to our hard drives instead.

How times have changed

The Sony Walkman revolutionised portable, personal music and the iPod took it to another level. But in my opinion, this format is far from perfect. MP3 audio is so compressed that it lacks its original hi-fidelity, and you can’t lend an album to a friend like you could with vinyl.

Maps have taken a hammering in recent years, too. GPS has muscled its way onto mobile phones and cameras. And I can see the benefits. When you’re taking a trip it’s best to travel light. A road map of France is likely to hold more information than you’ll actually need driving all the way down to Nice.

Plus, GPS maps are more personalised. If you’re a vegetarian your GPS could direct you to a suitable restaurant, or if you’re a blues fan it might let you know of a little blues bar round the corner from your hotel. It might take the adventure out of travelling, but oh, the convenience!

Time to move onto ‘the cloud’?

But don’t be tricked into thinking that the digital stampede will end once it’s obliterated its analogue and physical counterparts. I don’t think people will be satisfied with emptying the VHS drawer beneath the TV – I can see them wanting to reclaim the space on their computers’ hard drives too.

In time people will still own the maps, songs, video games and news that they buy. But they won’t be able to touch them physically – or even see the space that they occupy on their multimedia tablet’s memory. Instead it’ll all live in ‘the cloud’ and be accessible over the web through any media portal of choice.

Michelle says:
27 August 2010

Please let this never happen! There is nothing to beat the pleasure of holding an old, well loved book or crisp newspaper in our hands.


It’s funny this should come up, since Sony has just said that the PlayStation 4 will have to use physical discs (even though many of the PS3’s games and films are now downloaded onto the harddrive) because “We do business in parts of the world where network infrastructure isn’t as robust as one would hope.”

Kaz Hirai even says: “To think everything will be downloaded in two years, three years or even ten years from now is taking it a little bit to the extreme.”


Dude says:
28 August 2010

Agree with Michelle. If you don’t own a physical copy you don’t own anything. If the company, or for some other reason, go bankrupt or cease to distribute/support they product, say bye bye to all your items.

Just like today, Microsoft and EA and both full control of your content and they decide if you can download them even if its already purchased. Today, a ban from EA forum equal a ban to all your online games and a ban to your digital content.

I would hate that day,

not only will I have to pay 70$ the game, 300$ the game console and 50$/month for an active internet connection to play….I will then have to pay an additionnal 30-50$ fee if we exceed our download limit. We are gamers and our gaming will be limited by our country and our internet.

[Edited by moderators: Please refrain from posting any derogatory or offensive language, as we explain in our commenting guidelines.]


I really do not want to download a 50 GB film or game at 2 Mb/s to start with –

It would mean having a 100 Terra bit Hard drive just to store a few films or games,

Like Michelle – I love books – I have several 1000 – They can be read anywhere – no batteries to worry about – put in your pocket – and are very tactile.

GPS is good however – as it should mean it is up to date on all forms of road conditions. Maps usually aren’t – but Maps are great for hiking with contour lines included to help with hiking. One of The joys of hiking is the superb detail on maps allowing wonderful detours to be made. Somehow I feel GPS is rather more soulless.


The problem is the antiquated and bloated format that the industry insists on using to make you purchase new players and new disks. Even the longest of movies in the highest quality can be provided in just a few GBs which you could download in a couple of hours or less.

With books, think of the trees! The new readers use a minuscule amount of power and will store hundreds of books in the space needed to store just a single book.


Maps are such lovely things, a joy to peruse and examine. Online versions & SatNav don’t come close.

Dirk says:
29 August 2010

People will always desire to OWN something. To have a physical representation of something they like that represents all there hard work and energy. Formats and methods of selling may change, but you will always need a way to store purchased information that is in YOUR control. The cloud may offer a way to hold that information, but it is definitely NOT in your control. Digital content services like iTunes are the future along with very big hard drives to store all that information or whatever they will call it in the future. Purchasing items on a physical format like BluRay will probably still happen for at least another 20 years.

K Brown says:
31 August 2010

if it’s held in a cloud, then we are held over a barrel. we’ll have to pay every time we want to access it. And as the other commentor said, we won’t be able to lend or share it. this will be nirvana for anyone who is able to convert what they sell to digital. Already the BBC is trying to follow Sky by introducing effectively pay-per-view. Their phrase is something like “view only what you want to”. their aim is clearly “and pay for anything you do want to see”. Watch it happen, folks


Blu-ray is another betamax

Great idea, overpriced
vastly overpriced – it should have come down to near the CD-ROM costs and replaced it by now – the tech doesn’t cost that much more in mass production and does not justify the high costs.

Ask Blockbuster how many they rent – its dying.


I’m sure everyone has at sometime or another suffered a data loss and had to resort to their back up (if it exists).
I’m sure that the cloud will change computers and the internet, but people will still want accessible backed up copies of their files.
I’ll probably keep files on the cloud myself someday, but anything that’s important/valuable/private etc will be backed up and stored under my control – consequently the cloud won’t replace personal data storage (although the medium may change) it will just add to the alternatives.
It is a big ask for people to believe that the policy of the company operating the part of the cloud where their data is stored won’t change its corporate policy or levels of customer service – the very pace of technological change and the apparent lack of ethics in coporate circles make this unlikely.

H Dhokia says:
31 August 2010

To reinforce many foregoing comments and answer a few:
No matter how much you ‘own’ it you can not control anything that is not easily and physically accessible at arms length. Cloud means a server (perhaps several) somewhere well out of your reach and absolutely out of your control. Think lack of ethics in coporate circles coupled with invasion of all your affairs, not just privacy, by the governments. I remember a time when newspapers in this country used to laugh at the cold war era soviet model of just 2 official newspapers and the state organs getting everybody to spy on everybody else or else.

Except that it is done with whipped member votes in parliament, can anyone tell me how it is different in the west now?

Mike says:
31 August 2010

I particularly share Ben’s regrets regarding the poor sound quality of MP3 audio. Athough the format is highly portable it has, along with the inability of the industry to agree on a standard high density format to replace the CD, stalled the progressive development of affordable high quality audio. A great loss for hi-fi enthusiasts such as myself.


I agree that MP3 is not a good format. When memory was expensive and download speeds were dog slow, the format was a breakthrough.

Now memory is as cheap as chips (almost given away for free in your breakfast cereal) and fast download speeds are becoming more normal, it is time to adopt a lossless compression such as FLAC.

Some sites are already offering FLAC format and it is definitely the way forward. But they are few and far between.

Peter Arnold says:
1 September 2010

Much as I enjoy and admire the astonishing advantages offered by the internet and the ever-increasing capabilities of digitally-based devices, we all need to remember that a burst of electro-magnetic energy, whether from a weapon or from some astronomical event, could completely erase digitally based information and leave the planet relying on what survives of older methods of recording. For this re