Halloween spending rises like a bat out of hell

it is of no great importance that we Christians celebrate the Birth of Christ in December. Remember that there were no birth certificates then or records then. they only became compulsory in the UK in 1835 !!! Ancient people did not attach much importance to time and dates as we do today. Most knew about seasons but little knew about dates and months. It was the learned of the day who told them about it. (In fact, whether I am born in February of June is of little importance to others who believe that I am alive.) December is a good time to bring new life and the Light of Christ into a darkened world (northern hemisphere) so the Early Church Fathers fixed it close to the shortest day. Good idea as far as I am concerned. Belief does not depend on the day Christ was born but on the fact that his death was universally redemptive.

Ancient people did not attach importance to times and dates ??? .Maybe thats why the eastern /middle-east/Mediterranean areas of the Ancient World, population visited astrologers so often . From Chinese astrology to Chaldean /Arabian/Greco/Roman etc. Just because the bible only mentions = we saw his star in the sky and thats it doesnt mean the bible is the be all or end all of World knowledge as a matter of fact it is very political and not altogether truthful made up centuries later for very political motives by people who had no first hand or even second hand knowledge of reality in those days . Even the KIng James Version has been “doctored ” because it would upset the King as “supreme ruler” (all bow before him ) so reincarnation was left out as that took the power away from Kings /Religious bodies etc and put it directly into your own hands -ie- you are responsible for your own actions ,no body likes to lose power over the population. Tell me ? who is behaving like Jesus in 2015 -think carefully before you answer . Also Christianity is being quickly downgraded in this country due to political correctness banned in many places -no more RI in schools etc . Only one religion is being protected .

Every maintained school in England must provide a basic curriculum (RE, sex education and the National Curriculum). This includes provision for RE for all registered pupils at the school (including those in the sixth form), except for those withdrawn by their parents (or withdrawing themselves if they are aged 18 or over) in accordance with Schedule 19 to the School Standards and Framework Act 1998.

The key document in determining the teaching of RE is the locally agreed syllabus within the LA concerned (see ‘Agreed syllabus’, p.14). Schools designated as having a religious character are free to make their own decisions in preparing their syllabuses. LAs must, however, ensure that the agreed syllabus for their area is consistent with Section 375(3) of the Education Act 1996, which requires the syllabus to reflect that the religious traditions of Great Britain are in the main Christian whilst taking account of the teaching and practices of the other principal religions represented in Great Britain.

Rules are one thing but practice is another minority groups have a heavy influence on childrens education so much so that “indoctrination ” is being employed do I need to go into details here which will upset minority groups ? Anybody who challenges it is labeled-****** and ****** and **** its so bad now I cant even put down what I think in case various groups take me to court.

If what you say is provable then you have nothing to be concerned about.

Umm. Well this member of the public will be taking action by avoiding the commercial silliness.

I would support Black Friday being replaced by a World Peace Day.

Malcolm you are a serious contender for some of the websites I post on and I know exactly where to put the blame.

Beryl, I agree. It’s like all big events – need properly managing. From what I saw on tv last year it seemed to be very badly handled by some stores. Interesting if “lessons have been learned” (why is this always trotted out as an excuse when things go wrong – most lessons were learned a long time ago if only people were properly educated in their job).
Still a bit grumpy. 🙁

Just one observation. How bad were the issues last Black Friday? I know we saw images of mayhem, but the media is adept at only choosing exciting images, and I seriously doubt what happened in a few stores was reflected across the UK.

Oh, and I agree totally with Malcolm.

It’s good to know we can agree occasionally Malcolm and cheer up, I am suffering also from a very sore head today.

I agree lessons should have been learned from past overcrowded events, although on a much larger scale, such as Hillsborough and The Hajj.

Malcolm I contacted Which about spam from Which Convo telling me to take out a loan and wanting all my details I sent it to Patrick and he told me Which is hit with 1000,s of spam but it should not get to posters email addresses and is doing something about it .

I am sure the Black Friday message from Which? was not spam – I also received it and it is typical of the frequent alerts, ‘scoops’, trailers, and other announcements that are frequently sent to subscribers.

I think it is not necessarily good advice to do all your Black Friday shopping at John Lewis “because they price-match”. They only do that for the specific articles they sell, of course, and that is a fairly restricted range. In homewares, John Lewis do sell some ‘basic’ and ‘essential’ goods under their own brand but other shops sell similar branded or ‘own-label’ goods at lower prices. In consumer electricals they do sell some branded appliances at matched prices because they can buy direct from the manufacturer in much greater volumes than any other physical store, but again the choice is narrow and other shops might sell an equally good product by a different manufacturer at a lower price. ‘Badging’ manufacturer’s products with the John Lewis brand is another way of taking them out of the “never knowingly undersold” matching process as they are not identical; this is particularly the case with big ticket white goods and brown goods. That is not to say that these are not good value purchases but the best consumer advice remains: “Shop Around”.

I received this email too. It provides a link to 69 ‘Best Buy’ coffee machines, but many of these are the same machine in a variety of colours. That’s plain daft and I would expect Which? to reprimand a manufacturer for making a silly claim like this.

Yes John and Wavechange but the one I received ,and I have archived it, was a blatant advert from a “MR.Bill ” wanting all my banking details for a loan . This to me is very serious and looks like Phishing especially as my views on pressurised loans are that they are immoral and against my political beliefs due to the poor being unable to pay and sent to court and jailed all to cover up enormous reductions in welfare benefit . I speak very strongly against this elsewhere with the backing of UK chartable organisations . To get this type of letter from Which and yes the URL says so , made me doubt the veracity and standards of it. AND for the record as i know Which is watched by organisations I have never in my life asked for a loan -NEVER will – I would starve first – Every thing I buy is paid for . MY mortgage was the ONLY time I was indebted to anyone ,my house is paid -off long ago and my credit rating is 100 %

Just out of interest, DL, did you scan the full email header? It’d be interesting to know the original sender.

In reply to Ian and John I have got phishing emails for years because of BT originally using Yahoo an open book to all sorts of scams (even an illegal account that I couldnt erase ) .Now that BT has changed its email provider this is cut down BUT not stopped . All or most were rip-off emails purporting to come from BT but in scanning the URL it showed it was from an iffy source ,as well as bad quality reproduction ) . This made me get another email provider , the Russian Yandex this provides virus protection I get any of that type put straight to trash or dont appear ,so I know all about phishing . my problem is that the Which one I received was a perfect reproduction of the Which one AND the URL was the Which URL ,so if that didnt come from Which then Which has been hacked .

I think what you received, Duncan, must have been a phishing e-mail from a scammer using Which?’s URL to fool people. It sounds like a crude attempt and as we know millions of similar e-mails are distributed around the www every day. Because the bank scam has been comprehensively denounced and become unproductive for scammers they are moving on to other potentially plausible and more subtle covers for their activity, like charities, HMRC, travel operators, and other organisations which could reasonably seem likely to need the information requested. The scammers have no idea whether or not the recipients have any relationship with such spoof senders but if one in a hundred thousand is answered then they’re in the money. Reporting them to the purported host is probably a good idea but I have no particular confidence that much further action is taken other than registering the full issuing URL. I don’t suppose charities have the resources to investigate the millions that get sent out by fraudsters in their name. Personally I wouldn’t keep such an e-mail on my PC a second longer than necessary.

Thanks, DL, but nothing is showing in Google. Not quite sure why the address was moderated. Surely this is in consumers’ interests?

Okay – fair enough. Curiously, nothing was visible on a cursory scan. Anyway, as long as no damage has been done, I guess that’s fine.

The banks have actually been quite good and have whole departments dealing with attempted fraud. I am sure their efforts have put paid to a lot of the scams that used to circulate. Which?, as a sizeable organisation and with a specific remit for consumer support, needs to concern itself very seriously with what goes out in its name and the signs are that it does. People who book holidays on line are used to getting requests from the operator for additional information which is why those scams are ingenious but deadly.

Which? has alerted us to many scams, in the magazine and on Convo. I’ve never fallen for a scam and no-one I know has admitted to being a victim, though I know quite a few people who have lost money from accounts. Though I very much support raising awareness of scams, I would like to know common they are among people who are reasonably cautious.

Oh dear. We might get back on topic by Halloween. 🙁

I thought Patrick had surreptitiously manouevred this Conversation into the Black Friday phenomenon which has yet to pass.

Following the discussions, I decided to look for a Black Friday discount on an item generally advertised at £250 or above, which I was buying for a charity. Thanks to another forum I learned that a well known company had offered Black Friday savings in the past and sure enough, they have offered a 15% discount on everything in their catalogue. I then placed an order from another well known company that offers competitive prices throughout the year and made a worthwhile saving on the cost of the goods and even the cost of carriage.

I never did have much faith in sales.

My understanding is that ‘Special Purchases’ are not normal stock items, they are often purchased in large numbers, and sold at relatively low price compared with similar products. Sometimes it is obvious that the product is older stock that has to be shifted before newer designs go on sale. I presume that goods are labelled as special purchases to draw attention to their low price, and it may well be worth checking reviews and how a product compares with the latest models.

Even if there is no catch, advertising bargains sells goods.

A classic one is special purchase bedding at John Lewis – sheets in particular. Just plain colours. Since JLP must sell sheets normally in large numbers I can’t see a “benefit of scale” applying, nor are they old stock. I wonder if they are just lower quality sheets sold at a lower price to attract custom, but not really “bargains”. Perhaps someone knows.

We cannot always tell whether something is “as described or implied” – i.e. a bargain. A different spec tv or kitchen appliance for example. attracting purchasers by a lower price when the value is also lower is not a bargain, and is to my mind mis-selling. But is this happening?

For as long as I can remember ‘special purchases’ have featured in retailers’ sales. I believe the practice started in the drapery trade and was common in department stores, most of which started life as drapers. It probably began with textiles and spread to other homewares, china and glassware, pans and cooking utensils, cutlery, and sometimes furniture. Many of the stores had close business relationships with particular mills and manufacturers and in order to maintain even production levels the manufacturers offered bales or sets of products at discounted prices for release in the winter and summer sales. For the suppliers it was a good way to use up excess raw materials and reduce overstocks as well as to clear the warehouse for new lines. The practice also transferred into mail order catalogues which frequently featured ‘special purchases’. Most of the production included in ‘special purchases’ was manufactured in the UK and if it carried the manufacturer’s brand or label it could usually be relied upon to be like-for-like in quality with normal stock, the special selling factor being the bale or set of articles that was indivisible. These ‘bales’ or ‘sets’, albeit comprising more than might be needed, usually cost considerably less than the sum of their parts. The trick was to get the customer to spend more than they might have done in order to buy better quality goods at a tempting price so that the manufacturer, the retailer and the shopper all came away happy. There would also be purchases of lower quality goods at even lower prices and most shoppers could tell the quality by the weight and feel of the product. I am not sure the bargains these days are as genuine as they once were. So many goods are imported today and come in by the container load, sight-unseen till they’ve landed, it is hard to believe that the buying acumen that depended on the close links between the mill or factory and the store is as refined today so trustworthiness and reliability have probably suffered. As Wavechange says, with electrical goods which go through so many iterations it is a case of clearing stock of previous models and they should be no different to the same model when first sold previously at full price. They could well have been overtaken by later models with a different design, colour range, or features. If that is not important and if functionality and performance are acceptable then some good bargains can be had.

With regard to bedding in John Lewis, they do go to some trouble to describe the products accurately and give the specification, so for sheets as an example, it is advisable to check the thread count, the type of material used, and the size to compare with other non-sale examples – so that you are not comparing a linen kingsize sheet with a poly-cotton double or an 800-thread count with a 200. In last January’s “clearance event” – they don’t have “sales”! – we bought some new Hungarian goose down pillows that were a ‘special purchase’ and, so far as we can tell, they are exactly the same as the regular line and the lower price gave us an opportunity to either buy more than we might otherwise have bought or trade up to a higher specification than otherwise. Having bought some new pillows at good prices it was a natural [but unintended] progression to buy some new pillow cases; these were marked as clearance items, and the only difference from current stocks is that the colours are no longer available [hardly a problem].