/ Technology

Tech companies want your loyalty, till death do you part

This coming week promises to be a big one in technology, with Apple, Amazon, Microsoft and Google all vying for our attention. And the stakes couldn’t be higher – they each want your undivided loyalty.

Apple’s expected to launch a new, cheaper iPad mini; Amazon’s new Kindles go on sale; Microsoft is unveiling its ‘big play’ in the shape of Windows 8 and its Surface tablet; and Google has another Nexus-branded phone to show off. And the thing they have in common? They want you to belong to them.

It used to be that tech companies sold you products and left you to it. Opportunities for making money were limited to selling you something new, or perhaps a lucrative warranty here and there. It’s the model the likes of Dell and HP peddled very successfully.

However, companies are now looking elsewhere to earn their crust. Apple, Microsoft, Google and Amazon are creating both software and hardware to form closed systems that we consumers are meant to buy into.

Following in Apple’s wake

Apple was undoubtedly the catalyst for this trend. The likes of the iPod, iPhone and iPad have catapulted Apple from a well-known, but largely periphery computer and software company, to the most valuable company in the world. It’s a persuasive argument if ever there was one.

We only need to look at Which? members for evidence. In our survey, three in 10 members own an Apple computer or iPad, but one in four had only become Apple users in the last 12 months. And many customers are buying more than one Apple product as they seek that authentic ‘all Apple’ experience.

It hasn’t made Apple universally popular, but the idea Apple is uniquely ‘evil’ in this respect is simplistic. All of the above are gunning for Apple’s privileged position, no matter what pledges to ‘openness’ they might make.

Are closed systems good or bad?

There are no easy answers here. Besides the obvious simplicity they create, closed systems also offer a level of security and trust that shouldn’t be underplayed. Curated stores like Apple’s (and Microsoft’s upcoming Windows 8 Store) provide peace of mind from viruses and the like. It’s nice to not have to share your credit card details to all and sundry, too.

But while we gain security and simplicity, the long-term implications are troubling. Take Amazon as an example. Some estimates suggest Amazon is responsible for nine out of 10 ebook purchases in the UK. Amazon should rightly take credit for creating a service that consumers love to use, but you can’t take your books elsewhere. Plus, as Rich Parris discussed earlier this year, what happens to all those books you’ve bought when you shuffle off this mortal coil? Closed systems like Amazon’s make digital purchases fundamentally importable.

Combine this with complete market domination, and the implications for you and me aren’t good. As a recent article in The Guardian suggests, such dominations arguably give Amazon an unhealthy advantage when negotiating with publishers. And should its domination lead to rivals wilting, it’s hard to see how the consumer wins by Amazon holding such power.

And this is why the stakes are so high this week. Because the likes of Amazon, Microsoft, Apple and Google aren’t just competing to sell a few shiny trinkets, they’re competing for your loyalty. And the loyalty business is good.

Which of the following tech companies will you/have you given your loyalty?

I'm not loyal to any tech company (25%, 71 Votes)

Amazon (25%, 70 Votes)

Google (20%, 56 Votes)

Apple (15%, 43 Votes)

Microsoft (12%, 34 Votes)

Another tech company has my loyalty (4%, 10 Votes)

Total Voters: 183

Loading ... Loading ...
Comments
Guest
Suki Sharples says:
22 October 2012

I’d love an i-phone but can’t justify the cost yet…I would be loyal to Amazon, Ebay, Paypal and Google and would love them all to pay their taxes so that I don’t feel compromised by using them so much!

Profile photo of Sophie Gilbert
Guest

Betamax versus VHS, here we go again…

Profile photo of dean
Guest

It’s all about the marketing. they are not selling you a product, they are selling you a lifestyle. These companies then provide you with all the products to live out that lifestyle.

With tech you have a choice yet all of them have flaws. This is why I will never buy into a tech lifestyle because this means that you are easily swayed by marketing or peer-pressure. Products produced for a quick time to market are usually of poor quality.

The only brand that I am loyal to I guess would be Panasonic. Every TV I’ve had for the last 15 – 20 years has been one, apart from 1 Samsung which broke just after the warranty ran out. So I went back to Panasonic and haven’t looked back.

Profile photo of wavechange
Guest

Panasonic is one company I avoid. Technically good but they often don’t have a clue about a good user interface.

Profile photo of dean
Guest

I’m used to it, it’s the quality that is the most important for me and Panasonic offers it in spades

Profile photo of Ben Stevens
Guest

They used to say (I’m not sure who ‘they’ are) that encouraging someone to change cigarette brands was the hardest trick in marketing. I should imagine getting someone to forego the investment they’ve put into a closed digital ecosystem may now be a tougher challenge.

Guest

I hate giving my data to American (and other) corporations and governments. It might help if privacy was properly protected and stored only if needed for criminal investigation. It’s getting worse.

Profile photo of Jennifer Davis
Guest

I have to admit that Google are winning me over. I have owned a number of Apple products in the past including 3 different iPods, an iMac (beautiful!) and a Macbook Air, but ultimately – I always sold them and moved on to more ‘sensible’ tech.

I can totally understand while Apple fans become evangelists. The hardware is beautiful, the software is user friendly and they’re good quality products. But in the end, intercompatibility won out for me.

I really didn’t like using iTunes for my MP3s and couldn’t understand what an .aac file was supposed to be! I didn’t like not being able to drag and drop my MP3s like a normal windows filing system, and I was always haunted by tales of folk who plugged their iPods into other peoples computers and had them wiped clean.

I like to organise my own files, I like to personalise my screens (on my phone and computer) and I like to know that every product and piece of software I buy doesn’t further lock me into Apple’s universe. The trade off is the relative security Andy has mentioned, but for me – it’s worth it for the perceived ‘freedom’.