/ Money

Your view: checking in on cheques

A cheque being handed over

Our discussion about digitising cheques was followed by an impassioned debate to leave them be. The new system would let banks clear cheques via a digital photo. Here’s what the community thought of the idea.

Waltham needs cheques for his small business:

‘We run a small business where cheques and cash are still the main method of payment, only about 10% of customers pay via bank transfer and we see no reason to bear the additional cost of a card processing system.

‘If banks really want to get rid of cheques then the replacement system needs to be as reliable and free to use.’

For and against cheques

Mick thinks the paper cheque needs to stay:

‘I believe that there are millions of people that have neither smartphone nor a computer.

‘If this stupid idea goes ahead how will such folk control their money, pay their bills etc. especially as more banks are now moving to “counterless” outlets. There is nothing wrong with the cheque system, it needs to stay.’

Our Facebook friends even joined the debate. John made a plea for cheques:

‘There is a whole generation out there who are completely discriminated against and are being abandoned by the age of the internet and smart phones. They certainly do not want to see the end of cheques yet. They need our respect and support.’

Terry isn’t a fan:

‘Cheques are useless. We should scrap them. It’s only businesses and the legal profession who like them because of the built in delay in issuing/posting them and because they use them for audit trail.’

Security of digital cheque imaging

Phil was worried about the security of using a digital photo to clear a cheque:

‘What safeguards are there to prevent the image of the cheque being altered?’

Our Money expert Tom Wills put Phil’s question to the Payments Council:

‘They told me it would only be possible to submit photos of cheques taken using an app from your bank, which will use similar security procedures to existing banking apps to confirm your identity and secure your information.

‘The Payments Council also said that existing fraud prevention systems would be used, and that fraud levels have not increased in other countries where cheque imaging has been introduced.

‘We’ll be keeping a close eye on how banks implement cheque imaging and the security measures put in place when cheque imaging apps become available.’

Are you a cheque user? Could you live without them?

Leo says:
2 August 2014

I would prefer to keep,cheques as they are. I don’t trust internet banking, and certainly don’t want to use a mobile app for banking. I’m not a Luddite, I’m very at home with computers and technology, just don’t trust internet banking or mobile apps. And there are still LOTS of people who are not confident computer users (including many young people), and many people who do not have a computer or smartphone.

Keith says:
2 August 2014

The only reason banks wish to abandon cheques is their relentless drive for ever greater profit.


It’s not about increasing profit but about eliminating a costly an archaic system to process payments using archaic pieces of paper. Given that the use of cheques is now at a fraction of the level it was at before more efficient payment methods were introduced, the banks don’t want to keep a costly old system running to process a relatively small number of payments. It makes sense to shut down such an inefficient and unnecessary payment system.


Please don’t say that cheques are not necessary. A fair number of people have explained why this is not true and there was an outcry when it was suggested that cheques should be phased out.

The efforts of banks would be better spent in trying to regain trust than getting rid of cheques when there is obviously still a need and a demand for them.


If people want to keep cheques, then those people should fund the costs of operating the cheque clearing system. As fewer and fewer people use cheques, the processing cost per cheque will increase. Only people using cheques should pay for the system; others shouldn’t have to subsidise it. If you want to keep cheques, then let’s have a cost-reflective charge per cheque issued and/or deposited.


What about the costs of running alternative payment systems, including keeping security measures up to date?

If you were working out the costs of ownership of a car you would not just consider the cost of the fuel.


The average cost per payment of running Faster Payments Service is negligible, particularly as volumes increase. On the other hand, the average cost per payment of running the cheque clearing system is significant, particularly as volumes are decreasing fast.


OK, if I accept this, why will you not accept that there is still a need still a need for cheques? I have explained why they are important for small charities and others have given different reasons in our various Conversations on the topic.

Most of us with current accounts kept in credit are receiving little or no interest on their account balances but benefitting from ‘free’ services, irrespective of how much they use them.

I suggest that we don’t worry about the cost of processing cheques since the number in use is falling. I’ve been encouraging others to use alternatives to cheques for a few years, where a practical alternative exists. I’m a little bit tired of being told (by a number of people) that there is no need for cheques in the 21st century. There is, and what we need is practical alternatives that take account of the objections to phasing them out. Thats where the effort needs to be devoted.

The banking industry has a lot to do to restore public confidence and continuing to push for phasing out of cheques is not going to help. I have never forgiven the banks for denying that phantom withdrawals could occur.


I understand that very few organisations are good at managing contraction efficiently and pegging costs back as volume decreases so unit costs have a tendency to rise disproportionately, but it can be done. When I first opened a bank account there were not that many cheques in use as most transactions were in cash but nevertheless there was a practical and cost-effective clearing system [including town clearing to avoid every cheque having to go up to London]. This was part of the service banks provided to enable their customers to conduct their accounts and do business. Over time new systems and technologies have become available to automate and speed up this process but that does not mean that simple clearing now has to be ditched altogether; perhaps rather than a financial penalty there should be a time penalty for paper-based cheque clearing so that customers needing faster payments are incentivised to use the paperless services. Given the stupendous costs of changing staff uniforms every so often and rebranding the branches [Lloyds, TSB, Santander, Barclays, Cooperative – they’re all at it] I think the costs of processing cheques is chicken feed. The greater cost must be in printing and personalising them and since the banks are going to keep on doing that I don’t see the clearing costs as a major problem.