Will financial education strengthen the UK&#8217;s future?

I taught budgeting at my slum school to the non exam classes in the 1960s – Then Thatcher BANNED it – It should only be taught if the subject is part of the Maths exam – otherwise it will be ignored by the children. Passing exams are far more important to children.

wavechange says:

I support anything that will help make children better prepared for life. What concerns me most is the fact that so many people live their lives on credit, when they should be saving and spending only when they have enough money, which will save a fortune in interest charges. You don’t need to know anything about credit card interest charges other than the fact that they are all extortionate and the balance must be cleared each month to avoid a continuous drain on your finances.

A major problem is that university students are forced into debt because successive governments have pushed so many people into higher education and cannot afford to support them properly.

Malcolm R says:

Understanding the basics of personal finances will at least give young people the opportunity to tell good from bad. The problem with debit and credit cards is that they encourage impulse spending – you don’t need the cash in your wallet. But used properly they are extremely convenient, and essential for on-line transactions. The key is to use a credit card properly – pay off in full monthly.

We all mostly have to live in debt to be able to purchase a house – understanding the range of loans and financial consequences can only be helpful.

As for university students – yes, we have opened up too many places in poor-standard institutions and courses that devalue a degree, and probably lead too many to think it will give them assured employment. Not so. They need to weigh up the prospects of employment and the financial gain against the cost.

wavechange says:

The need to avoid debt is fairly easy to understand but I wonder how well school kids would grasp the complexities of house purchase, which is likely to be some years in the future for most of them. In addition to understanding loans there is the need to consider both additional and unforeseen costs of house ownership, the risks associated with inability to meet payments, possible negative equity and the fact that having a house restricts employment opportunity to the local area.

Reply Hide replies ∧

richard says:

Sorry most of your points were discussed in my non exam slum classes – and WERE understood – somehow I get an impression you never taught slum children with inadequate parents – but the amount of time to give a good working understanding is far too long and complex to be extra curricular – it needs to be integral to the exam. I taught it for 7 years until Thatcher introduced league tables and National Curriculum and banned it..

w j g says:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/9855418/GCSE-personal-finance-test-Can-you-pass.html

Its the goal of schools, to prepare young people, for the challenges that they will encounter when they become adults. For many years, schools have taught the structure of our currency system, but since the introduction of plastic cards, such as debit and credit cards, there is a need to understand debit, credit, interest rates, bank fees, sales tax, loan agreements etc.
We handle money either by cash or plastic, almost every day, and the household budget has always been an important part of our daily lives. A better understanding of financial products and how to handle money, along with advice on how to avoid traps that cause unwanted debt should be mandatory in schools.

Examples of GCSE Personal finance test.
Note..Some of the questions are not very clear with their wording.

Reply Hide replies ∧

wavechange says:

12 February 2013

As you say, some of the questions could be presented better. I suppose it is worth children learning about simple and compound interest, though comparing APR is usually enough.

Vivi (blackbullion) says:

Effective financial education must focus on habit, behaviour and understanding the consequence of decisions. If kids can grasp the concepts of needs and wants and living within their means then they are more able to understand the importance of the granular matters such as budgeting, debt and savings and that is when the maths and the specifics of financial products comes into the conversation.
Comparing rates is irrelevant if young people don’t understand the dangers of unmanageable debt.
Done well it can hugely benefit future generations.
I learnt from my parents, around the dinner table (and at the petrol pump, at the shops, in the department stores…..)

Reply Hide replies ∧

wavechange says:

Absolutely. It might be worth using payday loans to illustrate the dangers of unmanageable debt.

richard says:

12 February 2013

Wavechange – In our slum school – the FIRST thing I covered were pay-day loans and loan sharks (Not the same thing) Sadly Thatcher banned it in favour of League Tables.

Malcolm R says:

I agree that debt needs to be understood, and school is as good a time and place as any to teach it, as well as other key financial information.

I find it hard to understand why, if you have a regular income and a bank account that will accept direct debits, anyone should need a payday loan with a £20 charge for each £100 borrowed for repayment within (presumably) no more than a month. It seems extortionate. But I am sure there are reasons – can anyone give them? It feels as if they are trading upon people’s inability to understand the value of money and the consequences of borrowing..

Reply Hide replies ∧

Malc.Moore says:

Malcolm R if you had a partner who would rather pay4 a bottle of Vodka than pay an essential bill you would understand. Many low paid in work have little or no savings so if the washing machine breaks the Loan Sharks have a Great-day once they get into the circle of debt they find it hard to escape.During World War 2 mothers had to make every penny count and taught their children now
they don’t know because they have to work to make ends meet.So Schools have a responsibility to educate children how to budget.Those in Private Schools are educated so they can take better paid Jobs.

Malcolm R says:

Malc.Moore – I do understand what you say. But entering a downward spiral of debt fuelled by extortionate interest rates is something we need to try to combat – why these lenders are licensed beats me.
I don’t think private schooling may be any better at teaching money sense than state schools – the pupils may not have a home background that teaches frugality, something they may have to deal with if the inheritance runs out.

Malc.Moore says: