Going fully cashless will leave millions behind – do you agree with the steps the Access to Cash Review is recommending?
This is a guest post by Natalie Ceeney CBE. All views expressed are Natalie’s own and not necessarily shared by Which?.
Britain is not ready to go cashless. While many enjoy the simplicity and convenience of digital payments, they don’t yet work for everyone.
Our research found that around 17% of the population – 8 million adults – would struggle to cope in a cashless society.
Which? News: access to cash under threat
There is a widespread (and incorrect) perception that the main issue is with the old. In fact, the biggest indicator of being dependent on cash is poverty. Many people simply can’t take the risk of getting into debt, and cash remains the safest way of budgeting.
But we are fast moving away from cash. A decade ago, over 6 in every 10 transactions in the UK were in cash. It’s now down to just 3 in 10, and could fall to around 1 in 10 in 10-15 years.
Bank branch and ATM closures
We have an expensive cash infrastructure built for a world of high cash volumes, which is becoming unaffordable as cash volumes decline. We are already seeing cracks appearing with closures of bank branches and ATMs, but this is just the tip of the iceberg.
Today’s recommendations are built on a huge amount of analysis and data that we’ve gathered, not just from the UK, but also overseas.
We’ve taken into account a wide range of evidence, speaking to more than 120 organisations, including Which? and other consumer groups, as well as talking to thousands of consumers directly.
What we’re calling for
If we do nothing, we will have communities unable to access cash, and unable to spend it. We’re calling for:
A guarantee of access to cash
Cash access to be kept free to consumers
An investigation into the costs of banking cash for small businesses
A requirement for essential and monopoly services to accept cash
Rethinking infrastructure
As cash is free for consumers, we don’t tend to think much about the costs. But behind our ATMs and shops is a complex and expensive infrastructure costing around £5bn per year.
This was built for an age of high cash, and for profit. It’s now expensive to operate and, as cash declines, becoming uneconomical. If we want to keep cash viable, we need to think radically.
There are examples in Sweden, Norway and Finland that we can learn from. As their cash use has declined, they have created a joined up ‘utility’ for the wholesale infrastructure supporting cash, to keep cash viable.
We’re calling for the Bank of England to convene a group to develop a radically different model for the wholesale management of cash.
Policy and regulation
We can no longer take cash for granted. We need clear government policy on cash, a programme of work to develop digital payments which can include everyone, and a joined up oversight and regulation of cash.
Cash can no longer be seen as just a commercial issue. We believe that our recommendations will help keep cash viable for consumers, in a way which industry can afford.
But we now need action, before it’s too late – before we lose our cash infrastructure and millions are left behind.
This is a guest post by Natalie Ceeney CBE. All views expressed are Natalie’s own and not necessarily shared by Which?.
Help us protect cash as a payment option: sign our campaign
Do you feel that we’re sleepwalking towards a cashless society? How could we be more prepared?