/ Food & Drink

Should trans fats be banned from our food?

Stack of donuts

Nice has made a pretty dramatic statement with its latest guidelines, calling for a total ban on trans fats. Ok, they’re a particularly nasty fat type, but surely we can make up our own minds when it comes to what we eat?

A few years ago our research exposed high levels of trans fats in some foods, helping to prompt voluntary action by the main food companies to remove them.

“To their credit, many companies have made progress,” says our Senior Advocacy Advisor, Mette Kahlin. “We’ve been pleased with the voluntary approach by industry, but now it’s time to ensure everyone is acting.”
She believes the Food Standards Agency (FSA) should work with the food industry to make it clear that including trans fats is no longer acceptable, promoting the fact that voluntary action can work. “If not, then legislation should be considered, but only as a last resort,” she argues. “When most of the industry is acting responsibly, it’s important that any stragglers play their part too.”

One bit of the Nice guidelines we were pleased to see was their support for an integrated colour coding system on food labelling. The system includes traffic lights, the text “high, medium and low”, as well as %GDA to show whether a product has high, low or medium levels of salt, fat and sugar.

This is something we’ve been shouting about for years, and we’re not alone. Research shows consumers want it, the FSA wants it and now Nice wants it too. Shame the European Parliament still isn’t listening, but that’s at least 4-1 to us so far. Who will be next to join in?

Chris Plymouth says:
1 July 2010

The thing is they don’t always list transfats on the labels so you can’t choose not to eat it because you don’t know it’s there – and it is really nasty stuff, worse than saturated fat.

Dutchyboy says:
1 July 2010

While it’s great that companies are removing them, this sounds like you’re patting industry on the back for getting rid of something that shouldn’t have be in food in the first place. Trans fats are popular due to their relative low cost and the fact that they keep for longer, but their harmful properties are well-established. You struggle to think of other items for sale in your supermarket that are responsible for 1,000s of premature deaths that come without warning attached. As Chris points out, even people that are aware of them can struggle to identify them on an ingredients list, and as NICE argued their presence in fast foods in particular means certain population segments may be more at risk than others.

Bluealienfish says:
5 July 2010

Yeah, trans fats are bad but we are constantly being bombarded with ‘this is bad for you’, ‘that is bad for you’, I find it too confusing to sort out what I should be addressing first. If I avoided everything that we’re told is bad, I wouldn’t breathe let alone eat or drink.

There needs to be more co-ordination of messaging around a limited number of top ‘things’ so as to help ‘normal person’ sort the wood from the trees.

As for trans fats, there are a number of ways that they can be avoided…

The following is an extract from the NHS Choices website

Trans fats can be formed during a process called hydrogenation. Hydrogenated fats must be declared on the label so if a product contains hydrogenated fats, it may contain trans fats. Look out for the words partially hydrogenated on food labels these products may also contain trans fats.

If you want to avoid trans fats you should:

– avoid products that list hydrogenated or partially hydrogenated or shortenings on the label,
include lots of fruit and vegetables in your diet,

– use fat-free or low-fat dairy products,

– avoid fast food, high and full fat margarine and baked goods such as doughnuts, pastries and biscuits,

– use lean cuts of meat and poultry and cook them without skin, without adding trans fats,

– use liquid vegetable oil for frying, and

– ask about trans fat content when eating at a restaurant or café.

Richard Kinley says:
15 July 2010

Grown up people can decide if they care about what they eat and, if they do, make the necessary effort to avoid rubbish. Alternatively, they can decide that they've got better things to do, such as enjoying themselves.

Sophie Gilbert says:
28 July 2010

Much, much, much better labelling of our foods is certainly required. We’re getting there, but, boy, we aren’t there yet!

Could transfats and sugar be taxed more heavily? Maybe manufacturers wouldn’t be so tempted to lace their products with them, and maybe we’d buy fewer ourselves? And the money raised should be ring-fenced to go to the NHS.



’nuff said


Well said Chris. It seems to be totally obvious. We wouldn’t allow poisons to be added to food.


If our “Masters” choose to ignore us poor consumers perhaps we should collectively e-mail ( a shout mail?) them at a specific date. Perhaps it may penetrate their tiny minds.


Should the individual not choose what he or she eats without being dictated too weather that is full fat recipies or helthy what happened to human rights and this being a free country ?

[Hello mkgurd2, we have edited your comment as it was in all capital letters. Please turn off your Caps lock key, as this is against our commenting guidelines. Thanks, mods.]