/ Food & Drink

A new Food Crime Unit to stop a horsemeat repeat

Food fraud

The Government has today accepted the recommendations of the Elliott Report in full, including the establishment of a new Food Crime Unit. Will this give you more confidence in the food you buy?

I don’t know about you, but the horsemeat scandal really hit my confidence in the food I eat. The contamination of meat products across Europe made it starkly obvious that we didn’t really know what was going into our food and that fraud could be widespread.

We’ve been calling on the Government to take urgent steps to ensure a horsemeat-type scandal can’t happen again. Or, if it does, that it can be spotted sooner and those adulterating our food are caught and held to account through the Courts.

Professor Chris Elliott was commissioned by the Government to examine how food fraud incidents could be prevented from happening again. His report has now been published, and in a big win for our Stop Food Fraud campaign supporters, the Government has agreed to his recommendations in full. Hurrah! But what’s in the report, and is it any good?

Putting your needs first

Central to the Elliott Report is a ‘consumer first’ approach, where industry, government and enforcement agencies will always put the needs of consumers above all other objectives. We strongly support this emphasis (as you would expect), and we now want to see the Government outline how it intends to ensure your needs are top priority in food crime prevention.

One concern that became apparent during the horsemeat scandal was the lack of coordination across the Government and the Food Standards Agency. It’s quite worrying that since 2010 there hasn’t been effective means of coordination on food issues. This has been recognised in the Elliot Report – ministers will now meet regularly to discuss food crime to ensure problems are identified and rapid action is taken.

New Food Crime Unit

We had no idea how long horsemeat was present in our food, and there’s also the possibility that other foods out there are subject to adulteration. That’s why we need a body to take responsibility for investigating food crime – step forward the ‘Food FBI’ (as it’s been dubbed by the Daily Mail). This new Food Crime Unit (its formal description) will be set up by the end of 2014 and will be placed in the Food Standards Agency.

This Food Crime Unit is modelled on examples seen around the world, and will introduce capabilities for law enforcement style investigations into food crime. It’ll be key to identifying and prosecuting more of the criminals that mess with our food.

We welcome the publication of the Elliott Report and the Government’s full acceptance of its findings. We now want the Government to quickly implement all of the recommendations so that you can be confident in the food you buy.

Do the measures announced by the Government increase your confidence in the food you buy? What do you think about the introduction of a Food Crime Unit?

Will a new Food Crime Unit give you more confidence in the food you buy?

Yes (60%, 1,361 Votes)

Don't know (21%, 480 Votes)

No (19%, 422 Votes)

Total Voters: 2,263

Loading ... Loading ...
Suzie Morley says:
5 September 2014

A Food Crime Unit is a step in the right direction, but we all know how effectve the other regulators are. Will this one be any different?

Kevin Irish says:
5 September 2014

Depends on their powers, and if they are willing to use them.
Most goverment departments seem to lack ‘bite’.

Piano says:
5 September 2014

It is mainly prepared foodstuffs in which poor quality ingredients are hidden. If we taught those acquired skills of most immediate post-war shoppers in recognising freshness and origin signs it would be difficult for the bad products to make profits for fraudsters.
The use of freezers, slow cookers, pressure cookers and the modern halogen and microwave ovens allows even the busiest of families to enjoy freshly prepared food from selected ingredients.
Audit trails of produce can make a contribution but should not be relied upon to guarantee wholesome food.
Less dependence on “them” and more self-confidence in one’s own resources.


Cuts cuts cuts. First lets get the British economy working .Rebuild our industry, And export industry. ,Stop selling our industry to foreign people . If you import more than you export you spend more than you receive then governments and counsels wont have the money to spend on crime. and will keep cutting everything .We cant pay our way in the world by building things just like house building . Industry is our economy. Our economy pays to fight crime . And a horse meat repeat.


I agree with “stop selling our industry to foreign people”.

Governments keep telling us how good foreign investment is but that is not the reality.

More often than not, they either buy up our companies and shut them down, putting people out of work increasing benefits and unemployment costs and increasing our foreign spending or take over our energy, water and telecoms and charge us the earth to use them.


While there are big money and mutinational companies involved in food production, I do not believe any law/police force will be able to do much. Having said that, if it helps raise awareness in the general public about the abysmal state of the food sold today, it may be a good first step on a very long road to transparency and improvement in products currently are sold as food,

James Cunnane says:
5 September 2014

Mass-produced food now gives rise to much suspicion because it has so often been shown to be fake

M Whitehead says:
5 September 2014

any such unit needs proper teeth

David says:
5 September 2014

In theory, this should work, but it all depends upon the terms of reference and the enthusiasm of the people involved.
Whoever are involved in this, need to be prepared for a lot of opposition from the very people who are cashing in on the lack of enforcement at the moment – A lot of money is involved, and I suspect there are some ‘big’ names, if not behind the fraudsters, then placing orders to them for their sub-standard products.