Are 30% sugar cereal bars really a substitute for breakfast?

by , Senior Food Researcher Consumer Rights 18 August 2012
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
0 - 0
avatar

This month Which? investigated cereal bars and discovered that the majority don’t really deserve their healthy image. Most were high in sugar and many were also high in saturated fat.

cereal bars on red napkin

We looked at 30 bars, bakes and breakfast biscuits from the best-selling brands and 16 of them contained 30% or more sugar. While some of the sugar came from fruit, which obviously provides nutritional benefits, lots of it came from added sugars. Only one of the bars we looked at, Nakd Apple pie contained no added sugars.

Just a spoonful of glucose, fructose, raw cane syrup…

It wasn’t always easy to see how much added sugar was in each bar as manufacturers tend to use several sources. In total we found 18 different forms of sugar and most bars contained at least a few. At a glance this can make the cereal bar appear healthier than it is, especially if you don’t know what to look for the ingredients list.

Forms of sugar we found included: glucose syrup, honey, golden syrup, raw cane syrup, oligofructose syrup and of course, plain old sugar.

What’s for your breakfast?

Many people think of them as a healthy snack and choose them over a couple of biscuits or a chocolate bar. And according to an article in The Guardian this week many people are shunning traditional breakfast cereals and replacing them with cereal bars and breakfast biscuits instead.

Apparently due to the recession and working longer hours we no longer have the time for the more traditional breakfast and instead have taken to eating breakfast in front of our computer screens.

Which? has always been critical of the high levels of sugar and until recently salt in traditional breakfast cereals but the levels in the cereal bars we looked at exceed these.

It looks like we’ve swapped cereals, some of which have dubious nutritional value, for cereal bars and biscuits whose nutritional value is even more questionable. What’s in your breakfast – would you be put off cereal bars knowing that they’re not as healthy as their packaging might suggest?

26 comments

Add your comments

avatar

lessismore

We have found most of these too sweet I don’t just mean high in sugar but uncomfortably sweet to the taste A lot of them are no more than very sweet biscuits – they are certainly not a substitute for breakfast cereal

We have found some which have lots of oats in them and don’t taste so sweet I think these were Kelloggs oat bars and Frusli bars taste fruity We don’t like bars that taste like chocolate bars or jammy biscuits They are useful for the occasion when you have run out of milk and are in a rush – but toast is probably a better solution then!

avatar

lessismore

They were Quaker oat bars and not Kelloggs We stopped eating them when they disappeared off the shelves but they are still around somewhere I did try contacting them to find out where but they just said contact your local shops I did contact a couple but there isn’t enough time in life to just go chasing after these things I also tried to buy them online but they were out of stock I would have bought them in bulk!

avatar

laura

My daughter’s school has a healthy eating policy but allows these kind of bars in lunchoboxes. I have been saying for some time that these bars are no better than a chocolate biscuit type snack but have not been listened to. I shall now show the school this!

avatar

Tom

I’m a big fan of Carmans muesli bars that some Sainsburys stock.

avatar

Jo

Thank you to which as I eat cereal bars every day as I have breakfast at my desk and I want something easy to eat and healthy. Some of them are sickly sweet so I eat Jordan’s almond and honey ( cheap) or great myself to 9 bar which I was shocked to read is high in salt and fat because it doesn’t taste that way. Nakd bars are way too expensive. Someone please suggest a cheap but healthy alternative that is practical to eat at a desk. Thanks!

avatar

Dawn Ellie

My child’s school is strick at what we can put in lunch boxes but they do allow these bars. We’ve started to eat the nature valley bars, which are nice, are these just as bad for you? I think if these are so bad for you they shouldn’t be sponsors for sports, like the Olympics!

avatar

Kenny

Don’t think elevenses has ever been marketed as a breakfast or a healthy snack but they are great for an energy boost on the hills.

avatar

wavechange

I used to eat these bars but eventually realised how much sugar and fat I was eating, especially if I finished the box. :-)

avatar

jgh1

The most worrying thing is that seven of the products in your survey are described as “children’s bars” and might be a potential source of life-long sugar addiction.

Some years ago Waitrose had a range called “Food Explorers” aimed as children which was sold under large print claims of “controlled sugar” in shelf front advertising but with small print labels showing that some items were 2/3 rd sugar.

That range was eventually withdrawn but a responsible sugar commitment is still needed. Let’s name and shame both producers and sellers.

avatar

wavechange

It looks as if there might be a market for muesli bars that don’t contain a lot of sugar or fat. I assume that sugar syrup is used to keep the bars in one piece but there must be a better way.

I hope the manufacturer of the bars containing no added sugar does not proclaim this on their advertising when their product contains more sugar than many of the ones with added sugar.

avatar

Mantequilla

I like Alpen bars, very sweet, but never fill me up.

I’ve tried the less sugary ones but they taste very dry and bland. Back to the sausages then

avatar

Jenny

Just goes to show that until the Government gets tough with food producers about labelling (i.e. actually GOVERNS!) we will all have to carry on reading the small print. I’m not holding my breath …

avatar

barbara

try Stoats Porrige Bars – we got them at Conwy Feast a few years ago, you can buy online.

avatar

barbara

Try stoats porrige bars. We found them at Conwy Feast a few years ago, nice and oaty, not too sweet.

avatar

Tony Holmes

My wife and I are keen cyclists and as such often need to carry convenient forms of instant nutrition which we can keep in our pockets. We are both very ingredient conscious and suspicious of supermarket products and the transparent claims made by food manufacturers so we make our own muesli / snack bars which are easy to make, using known ingredients. The cost of course, is much more favourable to those bars you buy in shops. There are a variety of recipes on the internet or just make your own to suit your tastes. Well recommended !!!

avatar

RJoden

I’m absolutely appalled to find that I have been giving my child sugar and fat laden breakfast bars as a bedtime snack!! I was particularly shocked at the content of the All Bran breakfast biscuits, which don’t taste particularly sweet. I’m now going to make my own HEALTHY bars.

avatar

James Bowman

I now only eat the Nakd bars since they are wholly natural ingredients, with no sugar added.

These are naturally quite expensive and I have only seen them in Tescos and Sainsburys. However if eaten slowly they are filling and very tasty-there are about 5 or 6 varieties. Well worth a try especially if you are trying to reduce your processed sugar intake!

avatar

Julia Clark

I too like the Naked bars although they are expensive. I also like the fruitus bars by Lyme Regis foods (from Sainsbury) – not on your list .

If I am out an about I need any energy boost when I start feeling faint – these have to be preferable to buying a Mars bar, I just have to remember to take one.

avatar

E Darlington

As a Traidcraft supporter I was sorry not to see their Geobars in the evaluation of cereal bars. When they were first made (?10 years ago) a public health doctor commented that they were healthier than the others then available, but the recipes have changed since. They are sold in supermarkets as well as direct from Traidcraft, and have the advantage of using Fairtrade ingredients.

avatar

Marilyn

I only eat the very occasional Eat Natural Bar, not because I think it’s especially healthy but because I like them. But what’s wrong with a banana as a healthy snack?. No additives, an energy power pack which can be eaten/carried anywhere

avatar

Peter Dolman

Your article on cereal bars says, ‘Hydrogenated fats are harmful in the same way saturated fats are – they raise cholesterol and can lead to heart disease.’ I would recommend reading ‘The great Cholesterol Con’ by Dr Malcolm Kendrick. He believes that there actually is no evidence for this claim and his research is compelling. He says that this belief has become so ingrained that even when the evidence shows the opposite people just ignore it.

avatar

wavechange

The consensus is that trans-fatty acids, which are formed by partial hydrogenation of vegetable oils to solidify them, are undesirable in food.

The larger food producers have largely eliminated them from our foods and small amounts have not been regarded as harmful anyway.

avatar

Rob

I’m amazed that any of these snack bars should even be tested by Which? for “healthy” aspects. I’ve always considered these as “puddings/cakes” and rationed my intake accordingly. Anything labelled as an energy bar MUST have high energy ingredients, such as fats and sugars, both in standard format and as fruits and nuts. These were never intended as everyday lunchbox snacks.

By now we should all be aware that we need to read the labels and should not be surprised by this Which? report.

avatar

Cat E

As an Australian living in the UK I am desperate to find decent muesli bars here, everything is full of chocolate or so sweet they make my teeth hurt! Some Sainsburys do stock Carmen’s bars (Australian brand) – these are amazing but you have to hunt for them. If you can get your hands on them – do! (Fruit are the best, Apricot & Almond a close second!)

avatar

Hannah

I expected a bit more of Which? to be honest. This “investigation” is based on Which? wanting to get an easy, obvious story and not about informing us on the cereal bars are actually good for us. They say that 30 cereal bars were included which is a ridiculously small proportion of the market to judge on, and the bars they looked at were clearly ones that contained loads of fat and sugar. Tracker bars, Elevenses, and Squares for God’s sake! Squares is a mesh of marshmallow, I’m pretty sure most people would recognise it’s not very good for you. What about all the others that are actually marketed as being healthy, like Jordan’s, Carmen’s, Dorset Cereals?

Interesting that they include Belvita but not Ryvita. I found this article because I would genuinely like to know which cereal bars are healthiest, and all I got was an article demonising all cereal bars as being sugar-laden and/or fat-laden on the basis of less than 30 brands (more than one Alpen bar was included), most of which I wouldn’t touch anyway. Very helpful, thanks.

Come on Which?, you can do better than this!

avatar

Hannah

Ok, just realised they included one Dorset Cereals bar and Jordan’s. But my point still stands – there are far too many of the same brands here, tonnes of Nutri-Grain bars seem to have made the list. Why?

And you would have thought that 150 calories isn’t bad, given the fact that most chocolate bars are twice that.

Back to top

Post a Comment

Commenting guidelines

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked

Tired of typing your name and email? Why not register.

Register or Log in

Browse by Category

Consumer Rights

609 Conversations

7637 Participants

18519 Comments

Energy & Home

480 Conversations

5160 Participants

15513 Comments

Money

636 Conversations

4008 Participants

9760 Comments

Technology

644 Conversations

5535 Participants

14099 Comments

Transport & Travel

483 Conversations

3539 Participants

9861 Comments